Diabetes and DUI / DWI

Diabetes

Low-Blood Sugar in Diabetes Patients Can Impair Ability to
Drive

When drivers who are afflicted with diabetes have low blood sugar,
their capacity to drive safely can be compromised. Despite that roughly
one in seven sober drivers on the road suffers from diabetes, many police officers may not think of
medical conditions in a driver. Diabetes patients should therefore always
carry a medical ID.

One woman in Toronto, for example, was swerving her 18-wheeler as she
led police on a 50 km chase. She hit the railings on the side of the road
and driving very erratically. Eight cruisers surrounded her vehicle and
she finally stopped the vehicle. Police approached her with guns fixed,
and the woman replied, “What did I do wrong?” Police reports state that
her blood sugar was very low.

Even many emergency personnel are not informed about diabetic
symptoms. Another woman was rushed to the hospital with hyperglycemia, but the doctor had suspected her of
being under the effects of cocaine, and the ambulance driver thought she
was drunk.

If diabetes sufferers possess a high level of ketones-an
alcohol-smelling chemical compound-in their blood, misinformed medical
personnel may easily make poor judgments.

Having low blood sugar however does not serve as a defensible excuse.
Judges have ruled that low blood sugar does not lessen the accountability
of diabetic drivers.

Also See:

DUI Attorneys


Alcohol Leading Risk Factor for Cancer

Alcohol is a known risk factor for a number of cancers. To calculate the
proportion of cancer deaths attributable to alcohol and other risk
factors, researchers analyzed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and data
from the World Health Organization.

Over one third (35 percent) of cancer deaths worldwide were
attributable to 9 risk factors: overweight and obesity, low fruit and
vegetable intake, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol use, unsafe sex,
urban air pollution, indoor smoke, and contaminated injections. Cancer
sites affected by alcohol included the mouth and oropharynx, esophagus,
liver, and breast. Alcohol use was among the top 3 causes of cancer
deaths* worldwide (responsible for 4 to 5 percent of cancer deaths). Of
the 4 cancers that were largely attributable (more than 50 percent of
cases) to the risk factors studied, alcohol was a major cause of 2 (mouth
and oropharynx, and esophageal cancers). Comments by Richard Saitz, MD,
MPH:

Aggregate data such as these do not inform us about drinking levels
associated with specific cancer risks. However, they do tell us that
addressing alcohol use can help prevent cancer.

* Attributable to the 9 risk factors studied

March 10, 2006

Reference:

Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, et al. Causes of cancer in the
world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental
risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1784–1793.

Reprinted with permission from Alcohol and Health: Current
Evidence.

Source: http://www.bu.edu/act/alcoholandhealth/index.html

DUI Attorneys


Is Beer Drinking As Natural As Eating Broccoli?

Beer as Staple

A new series of commericials promotes beer as a staple of life and
encourages increased consumption of the beverage in general, USA Today
reported on April 23.

A new Anheuser-Busch ad campaign, which starts today, features the
theme, “it’d be weird without beer” and shows people in typical
beer-drinking situtions. Instead of drinking beer, though, patrons are
served broccoli, yams, mackerel or other products. “The idea here is to
promote the unique role beer plays in American life,” said A-B
spokesperson Francine Katz.

Although tied to the Budweiser name, the ads are aimed more at
increasing overall beer consumption than a particular brand. A-B even had
even approached rival Miller Brewing to co-sponsor the ads, but Miller
declined.

DUI Attorneys


Death Study of Alcohol Users

Mortality in Relation to Consumption of Alcohol

Mortality in relation to consumption of alcohol: 13 years’
observations on
male British doctors.
BMJ, Oct 8, 1994 v309 n6959 p911-8 (3K)
MDX Health Digest

by Doll R; Peto R; Hall E; Wheatley K; Gray R

OBJECTIVE–To assess the risk of death associated with various
patterns of alcohol consumption. DESIGN–Prospective study of mortality
in relation to alcohol drinking habits in 1978, with causes of death
sought over the next 13 years (to 1991). SUBJECTS–12,321 British male
doctors born between 1900 and 1930 (mean 1916) who replied to a postal
questionnaire in 1978. Those written to in 1978 were the survivors of a
long running prospective study of the effects of smoking that had begun
in 1951 and was still continuing.

RESULTS–Men were divided on the basis of their response to the 1978
questionnaire into two groups according to whether or not they had ever
had any type of vascular disease, diabetes, or “life threatening disease”
and into seven groups according to the amount of alcohol they drank. By
1991 almost a third had died. All statistical analyses of mortality were
standardised for age, calendar year, and smoking habit. There was a U
shaped relation between all cause mortality and the average amount of
alcohol reportedly drunk; those who reported drinking 8-14 units of
alcohol a week (corresponding to an average of one to two units a day)
had the lowest risks. The causes of death were grouped into three main
categories: “alcohol augmented” causes (6% of all deaths: cirrhosis,
liver cancer, upper aerodigestive (mouth, oesophagus, larynx, and
pharynx) cancer, alcoholism, poisoning, or injury), ischaemic heart
disease (33% of all deaths), and other causes. The few deaths from
alcohol augmented causes showed, at least among regular drinkers, a
progressive trend, with the risk increasing with dose. In contrast, the
many deaths from ischaemic heart disease showed no significant trend
among regular drinkers, but there were significantly lower rates in
regular drinkers than in non-drinkers. The aggregate of all other causes
showed a U shaped dose-response relation similar to that for all cause
mortality. Similar differences persisted irrespective of a history of
previous disease, age (under 75 or 75 and older), and period of follow up
(first five and last eight years). Some, but apparently not much, of the
excess mortality in non-drinkers could be attributed to the inclusion
among them of a small proportion of former drinkers. CONCLUSION–The
consumption of alcohol appeared to reduce the risk of ischaemic heart
disease, largely irrespective of amount. Among regular drinkers mortality
from all causes combined increased progressively with amount drunk above
21 units a week. Among British men in middle or older age the consumption
of an average of one or two units of alcohol a day is associated with
significantly lower all cause mortality than is the consumption of no
alcohol, or the consumption of substantial amounts. Above about three
units (two American units) of alcohol a day, progressively greater levels
of consumption are associated with progressively higher all cause
mortality.

Keywords:
Alcohol use; Mortality; Great Britain; Research; Heart disease
MESH Headings:

DUI Attorneys


Report on Alcohol & Health

National Institutes
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

For Immediate Release
Contacts: Ann Bradley 301/443-3860
July 18, 1997
Diane Miller 301/443-3860

Ninth Special Report on Alcohol and Health Marks Research Gains

Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna E. Shalala announces
the availability of the Ninth Special Report to the U.S. Congress on
Alcohol and Health, the latest in a series of triennial reports begun
in 1970. The report highlights recent research on the effects of
alcohol use, abuse, and dependence on individuals and society, new
knowledge about the mechanisms of those effects, and progress since
1992 in developing interventions to prevent and treat alcohol
damage.

“About 14 million Americans, almost 10 percent of adults, meet
diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse and alcoholism,” writes Secretary
Shalala in the foreword. While the proportion of adults with these
medical disorders has been similar each time that problem prevalence
surveys have been conducted, other epidemiologic measures show change:
Abstention has increased and heavy drinking has decreased among U.S.
adults. Per capita alcohol consumption, which peaked during the 1980s,
in 1993 reached the lowest level since 1964. Increased health concerns,
less tolerant attitudes toward drinking, and increased social and legal
sanctions against drinking and driving are possible reasons for these
changes, the report suggests.

Drinking patterns and problem prevalence vary substantially by
gender, age, ethnicity, and among discrete subgroups of these broad
classifications. As in past reports, the rate of alcohol abuse and
alcoholism among men is almost three times that for women. Separate
analyses show that, although per capita consumption since 1980 has
declined less markedly among women, men continue to drink more and
report more alcohol-related problems than women. Heavy drinking,
alcohol abuse, and alcoholism are most prevalent among 18- through
29-year-olds of both genders and least prevalent among persons aged 60
and older. Although heavy drinking and monthly and daily alcohol use
among high school seniors have declined since the 1980s, the decline is
less among college-bound seniors, and binge drinking is a widespread
problem on college campuses.

Alcohol-related morbidity and mortality remain significant problems.
As many as 44 percent of more than 40,000 traffic crash fatalities each
year involve alcohol and, although such crashes are decreasing, young
drivers continue to be over-represented in drinking driving deaths.
Liver cirrhosis, on the decline since 1973, remains the 11th leading
cause of death, and heavy drinking contributes to other leading
killers: heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers.

The population distribution of alcohol disorders and other alcohol
damage provides clues for understanding how that damage can be mediated
by individual attributes and environmental influences. The Ninth
Special Report describes these interactions in eleven chapters on
genetic, psychological, and sociocultural influences on alcohol use and
abuse; actions of alcohol on the brain; neurobehavioral effects of
alcohol consumption; effects on health and body systems; effects on
fetal and postnatal development; effects on behavior and safety, the
economic aspects of alcohol use and related problems, prevention;
treatment; and health services research. Produced by the National
Institutes of Healthks National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism with guidance from a distinguished editorial advisory board
and contributions from some of the worldks foremost alcohol
researchers, the 450-page referenced volume is a resource for
researchers, treatment and prevention practitioners, and policy
makers.

Across the alcohol research spectrum, the report documents new gains
from the 25-year Federal investment in alcohol research. Since the
previous report, geneticists using animal models have identified
several quantitative traits including alcohol preference, alcohol
sensitivity, and severity of withdrawal that are believed to underlie a
drinkerks response to alcohol. Systematic efforts are underway in large
human populations with high alcoholism prevalence to detect and map the
specific genes involved in alcoholism susceptibility, determine how
gender and other factors modify that susceptibility, and identify the
biological and psychological factors that influence the relationship
between primary gene products and drinking behavior.

“The alcohol field is uniquely poised to take full advantage of the
tools and techniques of todayks science to fully explore biobehavioral
linkages,” says National Institutes of Health Director Harold Varmus,
M.D., in the report preface.” This exploration will add significantly
to our overall understanding of other diseases where biology and
behavior are so closely intertwined.”

The relationship of the brain to behavior is the focus of
neuroscience research, where scientists are characterizing the many
cellular and molecular mechanisms by which alcohol produces immediate
and long-term changes in CNS activity. Unlike other psychotropic drugs
that work through a single receptor, alcohol affects many cellular
sites and processes including neurotransmitter receptors, cell
membranes, intracellular mechanisms, and gene expression to produce
intoxication, tolerance, dependence, and withdrawalpall behaviors
potentially mediated by pharmacologic agents. In addition to
naltrexone, the anticraving medication approved in 1994 for use in
alcoholism treatment, NIAAA researchers are evaluating other
anticraving medications, detoxification agents, alcohol-sensitizing
agents, and medications for use in patients with coexisting psychiatric
disorders. Effectively combining behavioral and pharmacologic therapies
for different patient types is a focus of current research.

The Ninth Special Report introduces several new applications for
alcohol research, including the recently tested and proved AMPS
program, a resistance education program for high-risk 6th grade
students that demonstrated positive results through grade 12, and
Project Northland, a community-based intervention that reduced the
onset of alcohol use, drinking prevalence, and the combination of
cigarette and alcohol use among 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students.
Researchers also demonstrated that reduced blood alcohol level laws for
young drivers reduce single-vehicle nighttime crashes, with the
greatest effect achieved by zero tolerance laws. According to NIAAA
Director Enoch Gordis, M.D., “Our researchers are conducting controlled
trials in prevention and have shown not only that social and regulatory
policies can be researched but that the application of research
findings to policy can save lives.”

Recently validated research applications for clinical practice
include behavioral therapies to prevent relapse and brief interventions
for use by primary care professionals to help nondependent problem
drinkers curtail drinking. NIAAAks health services research program
also aims to improve the accessibility, quality, effectiveness, and
cost-effectiveness of prevention and treatment.

Bound copies are available for $11 by written request to:

NIAAA
P.O. Box 10686
Rockville, Maryland 20849-0686

DUI Attorneys


The Link Between Alcohol and Body Weight

Results from studies on alcohol intake and body weight are inconsistent.
To help clarify the association between alcohol use and waist-to-hip
ratio (WHR) and body mass index (BMI), researchers in France analyzed
data from 2323 adults, aged 35–60, who had
participated in a study of antioxidant supplementation. Analyses were
adjusted for age, smoking, physical activity, education, and calorie
intake.

Overall, the relationship between total alcohol consumption and WHR
was J-shaped*; those consuming 0–12 g (equal to 1
standard drink or less) per day had a lower ratio than did those who
drank more or abstained. The J-shaped relationship was also seen for
total alcohol consumption and BMI, but in men only. The J-shaped curves
were due primarily to wine intake. Those who consumed
0–100 g (up to 8 glasses) of wine per day had a lower
WHI than did those who drank more wine or no wine. The J-shaped
relationship was also seen for wine intake and BMI, but in men only.
Spirits consumption increased WHR and BMI in a linear fashion for both
men and women. Beer consumption did not significantly affect WHR or
BMI.

Comments:

This study showed a J-shaped association between measures of obesity
and alcohol—primarily wine—intake. Whether the favorable
effects of wine were due to polyphenols or to inadequate control of
confounding (e.g., lifestyle of wine drinkers versus beer drinkers) is
unclear. Therefore, recommending drinking to prevent obesity would be
premature. However, gaining a better understanding of how alcohol
consumption relates to obesity—an increasingly prevalent health
problem—is very important.

R. Curtis Ellison, MD

Richard Saitz, MD, MPH

* Researchers determined that the curve was J-shaped by conclusions
drawn from regression equations.

Reference:

Lukasiewicz E, Mennen LI, Bertrais S, et al. Alcohol intake in
relation to body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: the importance of
type of alcoholic beverage. Public Health Nutr.
2005;8(3):315–320.

Source: http://www.bu.edu/

DUI Attorneys


Biological Impacts Of Alcohol Use

An Overview By: Michaele P. Dunlap, Psy.D, Clinical Psychologist

INTRODUCTION

Ethyl alcohol or ethanol, known commonly as alcohol, is the same
whether the beverage is wine, beer, or hard liquor. Beverage alcohol is a
drug that depresses the central nervous system, like barbiturates,
sedatives, and anesthetics. Alcohol is not a stimulant. There is no
question that the person who drinks alcohol seems stimulated. Speech
becomes free and animated, social inhibitions may be forgotten, and the
drinker can begin to act and feel more emotional. But these effects are
misleading; the “stimulation” occurs only because alcohol affects those
portions of the brain that control judgment. “Being stimulated” by
alcohol actually amounts to a depression of self-control. A principal
effect of alcohol is to slow down brain activity, and depending on what,
how much, and how fast a person drinks, the result is slurred speech,
hazy thinking, slowed reaction time, dulled hearing, impaired vision,
weakened muscles and fogged memory. Certainly not a stimulating
experience!

Alcohol is also classified as a food because it contains calories. The
average drink has about the same calorie count as a large potato but,
unlike a potato or any other food, alcohol has no nutritional value. The
calories are empty.

PHYSIOLOGY

Basics of alcohol metabolism:

Alcohol is not digested like other foods. Instead of being converted
and transported to cells and tissues, it avoids the normal digestive
process and goes directly to the blood stream. About 20 percent of the
alcohol is absorbed directly into the blood through the stomach walls and
80 percent is absorbed into the bloodstream through the small
intestine.

Alcohol dilutes itself in the water volume of the body in order to
travel through the system. Those vital organs, like the brain, that
contain a lot of water and need an ample blood supply are particularly
vulnerable to the effects of alcohol. Alcohol’s dilution in the body does
cut its effect somewhat. There one important biological difference
between men and women comes into play: Muscle tissue contains more water
than fat tissue, so men — who have more muscle and less fat on the
average than women — can have about 10 percent more water in their
bodies. If a lean man and a lean woman of equal weight consume the same
amount of liquor, the woman is more adversely affected for this and other
reasons.

The initial impact of alcohol:

The brain, liver, heart, pancreas, lungs, kidneys, and every other
organ and tissue system are infiltrated by alcohol within minutes after
it passes into the blood stream. The strength of the drink will have a
significant effect on absorption rates, with higher concentrations of
alcohol resulting in more rapid absorption. Pure alcohol is generally
absorbed faster than diluted alcohols, which are, in turn, absorbed
faster than wine or beer.

Alcohol taken in concentrated amounts can irritate the stomach lining
to the extent that it produces a sticky mucous which delays absorption.
The pylorus valve which connects the stomach and small intestine may go
into spasm in the presence of concentrated alcohol, trapping the alcohol
in the stomach instead of passing it on to the small intestine where it
would be more rapidly absorbed into the blood stream. The drinker who
downs several straight shots in an effort to get a quick high may
actually experience a delayed effect. Finally, the temperature of the
beverage affects its absorption, with warm alcohol being absorbed more
rapidly than cold alcohol.

Measurement of effect by blood alcohol level (BAL):

The drinker’s blood alcohol level rises as a factor of the
relationship among the amount of alcohol consumed, body size and
proportion of body fat, the amount of food in the stomach, and what is
mixed with the alcohol. The BAL rises more rapidly in those who drink on
an empty stomach. Water and fruit juices slow the absorption process,
while carbon dioxide speeds it up. The carbon dioxide in champagne and
carbonated mixers such as Cola, and soda water rushes through the stomach
and intestinal walls into the blood stream, carrying alcohol with it and
creating a rapid rise in BAL. A 0.08 BAL, for example, indicates
approximately 8 parts alcohol to 10,000 parts other blood components.
When a person drinks more alcohol than his or her body can eliminate,
alcohol accumulates in the blood stream and the BAL rises.

Elimination of alcohol from a healthy adult body occurs at an average
rate of approximately to 3/4 ounce per hour, the equivalent of 1 ounce of
100-proof whiskey, one large beer, or about 3 to 4 ounces of wine. When
blood alcohol concentrations reach very high levels, the brain’s control
over the respiratory system may be paralyzed. A .30 BAL is the minimum
level at which death can occur; at .40 the drinker may lapse into a coma.
At .50 BAL, respiratory functions and heartbeat slow drastically, and at
.60 most drinkers are dead.

BODY SYSTEMS AND EFFECTS

The Liver:

Located in the upper-right side of the abdomen, the liver is the
body’s largest glandular organ. Its complex functions are associated with
dozens of processes of body chemistry and metabolism. It produces the
bile that helps digest fatty foods; it manufactures heparin, an
anticoagulant, it stores and releases sugar. The liver also produces
antibodies that help ward off disease, and it cleanses the body of
poisons, including alcohol. With small amounts of alcohol, this cleansing
can happen effectively. When the amount of alcohol is high, imbalances
are created which can lead to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar),
hyperuricemia (as in arthritis or gout), fatty liver (which may lead to
hepatitis or cirrhosis), and hyperlipemia (build-up of fats sent to the
bloodstream; which leads to heart problems).

The Central Nervous System:

The central nervous system (CNS) includes the brain, the spinal cord,
and the nerves originating from it. Sensory impulses are transmitted to
the CNS and motor impulses pass from it. When alcohol acts on the CNS,
intoxication occurs, affecting emotional and sensory function, judgment,
memory and learning ability. Smell and taste are dulled. The ability to
withstand pain increases as the BAL rises.

Different parts of the brain seem to be affected by alcohol at
different rates, creating alternate periods of restlessness and stupor.
Long-term effects of alcohol on the central nervous system include
tolerance, dependency, and irreversible damage. Changes in tolerance for
alcohol, and the alcoholic drinker’s dependency on alcohol, demonstrate
that changes occur in the brain.

With each drinking episode, central nervous system functions
deteriorate in a predictable sequence, beginning with intellectual
functioning, followed by disturbances in sensory and motor control. Last
affected are the automatic biological functions, such as breathing and
heart action.

The brain is the organ that is most affected by alcohol, and proves
that it is being damaged through the drinker’s behavior changes and
emotional distress. Three noticeable effects of alcohol injury to the
brain: memory loss, confusion, and augmentation. (Augmentation is a
physiological response to alcohol which results in hyper-alertness to
normal situations, perceiving light as brighter or sounds as louder than
usual, or the drinker’s becoming extremely sad or
angry for no apparent reason.) The drinker’s rapid mood swings and
emotional and behavioral instability can be brought under control by
stopping drinking.

Blackouts, or loss of memory for a period during drinking, are a
physical effect of alcohol on the brain. They occur as alcohol cuts off
the supply of oxygen to the brain. Lack of oxygen supply to the brain can
kill tens of thousands of brain cells every time a person becomes
intoxicated.

Another effect of alcohol on the brain is the “learned behavior
syndrome”; when a behavior is learned under the influence of alcohol, the
drinker sometimes must re-learn that behavior after stopping
drinking.

The Blood:

One effect of drinking alcohol is “blood-sludging” where the red blood
cells clump together causing the small blood vessels to plug up, starve
the tissues of oxygen, and cause cell death. This cell death is most
serious, and often unrecognized, in the brain. With this increased
pressure, capillaries break, create red eyes in the morning, or the red,
blotchy skin seen on the heavy drinker’s face. Blood vessels can also
break in the stomach and esophagus leading to hemorrhage, even death.

Other effects of alcohol on the blood include: anemia; sedation of the
bone marrow (which reduces the red and white blood count, and weakens the
bone structure); lowered resistance to infection; and a decrease in the
ability to fight off infections.

The Gastrointestinal Tract:

The stomach, the small and large intestines, and the pancreas are each
affected by alcohol. Alcohol increases acid in the stomach. That can
result in gastritis or stomach or intestinal ulcers. The pancreas
produces insulin which is necessary to regulate the amount of sugar in
the blood. Drinking causes a steep rise in the blood sugar; the pancreas
responds by producing insulin which causes a fast drop in blood sugar and
the symptom of low blood sugar or hypoglycemia. 70-90% of alcoholics
suffer to some degree from the disorder of hypoglycemia, chronic low
blood sugar, as a long term effect of their drinking. Symptoms of
hypoglycemia can include dizziness, headaches, lack of ability to
concentrate, depression, anxiety, light-headedness, tremors, cold sweats,
heart palpitations, loss of coordination, and upset stomach. In time, the
drinker’s overworked pancreas may stop producing insulin and diabetes can
result. Conversely, a person with a family history of diabetes may be
more vulnerable to problems with alcohol.

The Muscles:

Alcohol reduces blood flow to the muscles, including the heart,
causing muscle weakness and deterioration. One outcome is cardiomyopathy
(sluggish heart) which is common in alcoholics. Another outcome,
arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat), or “holiday heart,”is often treated in
emergency wards after several days of party drinking. Muscle aches are a
common symptom of excessive-drinking “hangovers.”

The Endocrine System:

This system controls the body’s hormones and includes the pineal,
pituitary, thyroid, and adrenal glands, and the ovaries or testes.
Alcohol sedates these glands, resulting in under-production of hormones;
effects include increased susceptibility to allergies. Alcohol can effect
sexual functioning in various ways. In low doses, it lowers inhibitions
and may make a person feel sexier; but in higher doses, it can decrease
sexual functioning: in men, by decreasing the frequency of erections,
decreasing the maintenance of erections, decreasing penile size during
erection, and increasing the amount of time between erections, in women
by interfering with normal processes of sexual stimulation, and blocking
orgasmic response. With chronic and prolonged use of alcohol in men,
there is a shrinkage of sex glands and an increase of the “female
hormone” estrogen. This produces secondary sexual characteristics, such
as enlarged breasts and a decrease in body hair. Prolonged use of alcohol
can cause infertility in both men and women.

TERMS TO UNDERSTAND

Tolerance: As people drink, their tolerance for alcohol may increase.
They might seem to be able to “handle” alcohol better and need more to
achieve the same effect as before. The liver does not become more
tolerant, and is damaged over the course of time, leading to poor liver
function and a noticeable decrease in tolerance, or “reverse-tolerance”.
A heavy drinker’s reverse-tolerance is a sign of late-stage
alcoholism.

Withdrawal: The effects of alcohol on the body account for the sick,
uncomfortable, shaky feelings following a period of drinking. Withdrawal
symptoms vary in intensity according to the amount and prolonged
frequency of drinking.

Symptoms of alcohol withdrawal include:

hangovers — fairly common result of overindulging– headache,
fatigue, thirst, and nervousness. There may be nausea and abdominal
cramping. Diagnosed alcoholics report fewer hangovers than drinkers who
are non-alcoholic, this may be because they have learned to ignore the
symptoms. sleep disturbance — waking up earlier than usual after
expecting to “sleep it off,” being unable to fall asleep, disturbed
dreaming. irritability, anxiety, and restlessness — all caused by the
irritant effects of alcohol. tremors, or “morning shakes”– Tremors will
clear after several days of abstinence, if there is no permanent damage
to the nervous system physical weakness, rapid heart rate, mental
sluggishness difficulty thinking clearly or flexibly All the above are
lingering evidence of alcohol’s impact on muscles, heart and brain.

For the drinker with only a mild degree of physical dependence,
withdrawal effects may not extend beyond the symptoms listed above.

Some drinkers experience second stage withdrawal, marked by:

convulsions — seizures usually occur between 12 and 48 hours of the
last drink. There may be a loss of consciousness and body control. Third
stage withdrawal symptoms involve:

alcoholic hallucinosis and delirium tremens — auditory, visual and
tactile hallucinations occur. This period may last for three to four
days, during which the de-toxifying person is in a severe state of
agitation, is often completely disoriented and sleeps little, if at all.
The delusions are almost always terrifying and may produce violent
behavior. There is a 10%-20% mortality rate associated with this stage of
withdrawal. Detoxification of the acutely ill alcoholic requires medical
supervision.

SPECIAL CONCERNS OF WOMEN

Female drinkers reach higher blood alcohol levels (BAL’s) faster
because of less water and more fat in the body and because of differences
in digestive enzymes. Women develop alcohol-related disorders such as
brain damage, cirrhosis and cancers at lower levels of drinking than men.
It is also known that the menstrual cycle affects alcohol metabolism in
women. Women have been shown to develop their highest BAL’s immediately
before menstruating, and their lowest on the first day of menstruation.
This can be related to hormone level shifts. There is evidence which
shows that premenstrual syndrome with its emotional and physical
discomfort and de-stabilized blood-sugar levels can trigger excessive
drinking by some women.

FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME (FAS) and FETAL ALCOHOL EFFECT
(FAE)

Women who drink during pregnancy risk the development of both mental
and physical defects in their children. Effects on the child can include:
growth deficiencies; poorly formed bones and organs, heart abnormalities,
cleft palate, retarded intellect, delayed motor development, poor
coordination, behavior problems, and learning disabilities. Smoking
cigarettes, combined with alcohol use, will increase the chance of birth
defects. Use of alcohol increases the chance of miscarriage. It is best
that a woman avoid alcohol, cigarettes, caffeine, and other drugs
entirely during pregnancy. Antabuse is not a suitable treatment for the
pregnant or potentially pregnant alcoholic woman; it interferes with
maternal liver function and may cause harm to the developing fetus.

Since harm to the infant may result even before a woman realizes that
she is pregnant, women who might become pregnant need to be particularly
cautious about what they consume.

NUTRITIONAL OVERVIEW

Secondary Diabetes: Diabetes can result from prolonged, excessive use
of alcohol. Because it is caused by drinking and not from a genetic
disorder, it is called “secondary” diabetes. The symptoms are identical
to genetic or “primary” diabetes. Abstinence from alcohol is a vital part
of treatment for this disorder.

Vitamins and Proteins: Those who use alcohol excessively deprive their
bodies of essential nutrients. The drinker and the recovering alcoholic
must pay special attention to diet. A diet high in protein not only
provides many of the nutrients vital to recovery, but also keeps the
blood sugar from too rapid change. It is better for those who drank
excessively to get protein from eggs, milk, or vegetables, than from
meats or cheeses. Because of an already-fatty liver, excessive drinkers
cannot process the extra fat. When they eat meat, fruit should be eaten;
it aids in breaking down fats. Vitamin supplements are helpful for people
with drinking problems: these include, vitamins A, B, C and E. Protein
supplementation may be important to reducing alcohol craving and
maintaining emotional balance for alcoholics wanting to recover from
their past heavy drinking. Similarly, a diet high in complex
carbohydrates stabilizes blood glucose and reduces the low blood sugar
state that can lead to craving alcohol. Understanding one’s own special
nutritional needs is an important aspect of recovery from excessive
alcohol use.

OTHER DRUGS AND ALCOHOL

Drugs such as marijuana and cocaine which are used, like alcohol, for
“recreational” purposes have different, but similarly harmful, physical
effects.

Research on marijuana use has shown several severe emotional and
physical effects:

Frequent use can lead to the “amotivational syndrome”, in which the
person becomes apathetic, loses the ability to set realistic goals, lacks
drive and ambition.

An active ingredient of marijuana (THC) settles in the fatty tissues
of the body, especially in the reproductive organs. Male hormone levels
drop and there is an increased level of impotence. Drop in hormone levels
for women will affect the menstrual cycle and may result in a higher
incidence of miscarriages.

Marijuana has from 7 to 10 times as much tar as one cigarette,
increasing the chances of lung damage and emphysema. The chemistry of
marijuana is extremely complex, dried marijuana contains over 420
chemical compounds–Delta 9 THC is generally cited as the psychoactive
ingredient of marijuana, but research suggests that other compounds
acting independently or interacting with Delta-9-THC also contribute to
the intoxicating potency of the drug. While stored in body fats, THC and
its metabolites are slowly released back into the bloodstream. Complete
elimination of a single dose can take 30 days.

Given the slow clearance of marijuana’s chemicals from the body,
researchers predict that repeated use of marijuana at intervals of less
than 8 to 10 days results in accumulation of THC and other psychoactive
substances in the tissues of body and brain.

If marijuana is used with alcohol, the effect is greater than if the
two effect patterns were added together.

Driving after using either alcohol or marijuana is unsafe, after using
both, driving is more than twice as dangerous. Judgment, reaction time,
and coordination are worse than with either drug taken alone.

Cocaine, “Crack” and amphetamines are fast-acting stimulants. People
who use alcohol and stimulant drugs together will drink more to feel the
effects of alcohol because of the stimulant effects. When stimulant
effects wear off, the alcohol effects “catch up” quickly, and that can be
extremely dangerous, both in terms of physical effects and distortions of
perception and judgment.

Stimulants are also quickly-addicting drugs which cause their users to
need more and more to get the same “high”. Chronic stimulant use leads to
dysphoria–a depressed, low-energy state; flattened emotions, a lack of
interest in sex, and physical immobility.

The physical and psychological consequences of heavy stimulant use
include: hallucinations and delusions, a mental state that appears
“really crazy.” Many stimulant users experience formication, the
sensation that their skin is crawling with bugs. Impaired judgment and
feelings of persecution are common. Users may overstimulate their heart
muscles and cause sudden death from a single heavy dose.

PRESCRIPTIONS

Drugs prescribed for medical conditions are frequently harmful if
combined with alcohol. Addiction to alcohol is addiction to all
sedatives. Drugs which are prescribed to combat anxiety include various
sedatives, “tranquilizers” and barbiturates; most frequently prescribed
is Valium. Tranquilizers are addictive, and, if taken with alcohol will
multiply the effects of both to sedate the user. This interactive effect
can lead to a coma or death. Sometimes antidepressants, or amphetamines,
are prescribed to treat depression or for weight control. These drugs
speed up the nervous system and are addicting. Because they are
stimulants, the effects of drinking while using them is like the effect
of cocaine with alcohol — they “cancel each other out” until the
stimulant wears off, then intoxication occurs quickly.

Medication of any kind should not be mixed with alcohol. None should
be taken by the recovering person, unless the physician who prescribes is
fully aware of the alcohol use history.

Over-the-counter or “ordinary” medicine such as cold tablets or cough
medicine are frequently used without caution. Drugstore medicines can
have dangerous effects when mixed with each other, with alcohol, or when
taken by the recovering alcoholic. Read the label. Ask the druggist.

DUI Attorneys


Gene Link To Alcoholism

Gene Link to Alcoholism

A defective gene may be linked to alcoholism, researchers at the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey said.

UPI reported April 12 that a study of 533 patients at the V.A. Medical
Center in Lyons, N.J. found that alcoholics were 12 times more likely
than a control group to have a defect in a gene for arylslfatase A, an
enzyme in the nervous system. “I thnink this will be one of many genes
that will be found to cause alcoholism or predispose people,” said
researcher Paul Manowitz.

Seven percent of all alcoholics may have the defective gene, he said.
The fefect causes the enzyme to fade away too quickly in the cells, and
low levels of this particular enzyme have been linked to other behavioral
problems.

DUI Attorneys


Elderly Alcoholics

Elderly Alcoholics

More than 3 million Americans over age 60 have a drinking problem, the
New York Times reported April 18.

Retirement, declining health, loss of loved ones and isolation are
some of the emotional strains that can lead to drinking among older
Americans, who also face fewer of the constraints that limit drinking by
younger people. Older people often have no job to lose, and a social life
that often revolves around happy hour at the retirement community.

Stigma also is worse among older people, who grew up in a time where
alcoholism was widely considered a sin, not a disease.

Despite the problems of late-onset drinking, there are only a handful
of programs nationally that treat the elderly. The American Medical
Association recently issured physician guidelines to help doctors spot
the signs of alcoholism among older patients.

DUI Attorneys


Drunk Driving and Drugged Driving

Drunk Driving and Drugged Driving
POLICY PEEK By ERNESTO F. HERRERA

To begin with, how do law enforcers determine if drivers are driving
over the legal limit here? How many cities and municipalities equip their
traffic enforcers with breathalyzers, for instance?

In a country where the most popular Filipino athlete endorses its most
popular beer, the drunk-driving offense of Mel Gibson seems less
controversial than his vitriolic, anti-Semitic outburst at
law-enforcement officials who accosted him.

But the United States government takes drunk driving very seriously.
Gibson is, in fact, facing criminal charges for driving under the
influence of alcohol and having an open container of liquor in his
car.

Driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI)
is considered a crime in every state in the US. Just to clarify though,
driving after consuming alcohol is not necessarily illegal unless the
person’s ability to drive is impaired, as defined by
law. Driving while having an open container of liquor inside the vehicle
is, however, an outright violation in certain jurisdictions, obviously in
Malibu, where Gibson was arrested.

Gibson was caught speeding, and so, regardless of whether there was an
open container of liquor in his car or not, he had to be tested as
mandated by US laws. In the US, if the police see you driving erratically
or violating traffic laws, they can automatically submit you to various
tests, which determine the amount of alcohol in your blood. A
blood-alcohol test by means of a “breathalyzer” and/or urine sample is
expressed in terms of milligrams of alcohol per milliliters of blood, or
as a percentage. (10 mg/100 ml = 0.01 g/100 g = 0.01%). I think most, if
not all, US states have an illegal limit of .08%. I believe Gibson was
determined to have .12 percent of alcohol in his blood.

Here in the Philippines, there are also drunk-driving ordinances in
most cities, with penalties that include fines, suspension of
one’s driving license and jail terms. But, as we all
know, enforcement is not as strict as it is in the US.

To begin with, how do law enforcers determine if drivers are driving
over the legal limit here? How many cities and municipalities equip their
traffic enforcers with breathalyzers, for instance? Are they capable of
conducting blood tests to determine if the driver is over the statutory
amount? Or do they just rely on smelling drivers, judging their conduct,
language (slurred speech, e.g.) and motor movements to determine if they
are indeed drunk?

Foreigners I have talked to often make comments that drunk-driving
laws here are a joke. It’s also a culture thing, they
say. Filipinos take pride in being able to hold their liquor. They say it
seems to be a macho thing for most Filipino males to be able to drink and
drive, mocking the popular admonition, “Don’t drink
and drive.”

Technically, there’s not even a national law
against drunk driving. If I recall correctly, Senate President Manny
Villar introduced a bill for the purpose when he was still chairman of
the Senate finance committee. Under his bill, Villar proposed that
persons found guilty for the first time of drunk driving must face a
suspension of their driver’s license for one year and
be made to pay a fine of P1,000. On the second offense, a fine of P5,000
and a five-year suspension of the driver’s license
will be imposed. I don’t recall the bill having gone
past the committee level though.

In Makati, Jejomar Binay wants to be stricter not only against drunk
driving but also “drugged driving.” Last year the Makati City Council
passed an ordinance imposing a fine of P2,500 or imprisonment—or
both—on persons who drive their vehicles while under the influence
of drugs or liquor.

The city government acquired testing kits to be used in checking the
blood-alcohol level of intoxicated or drugged drivers. Suspected drivers
can also be taken to the Ospital ng Makati, which now conducts testing on
a 24-hour basis. So Makati traffic officers don’t need
to rely only on physical manifestations of being intoxicated or drugged,
which might not be able to hold up in court when cases are filed against
those caught red-handed. Just like in the US, the testing is mandatory if
you are caught violating traffic or driving errantly.

In Makati, drivers who register a .13-percent blood alcohol level are
considered unfit to drive and will be charged according to the
drunk-driving ordinance. Interestingly, Gibson would not have been
legally drunk in Makati. (Maybe, Filipinos really have a high tolerance
for alcohol, otherwise how do you explain the more lenient standards for
blood alcohol tests?)

Has the city ordinance encouraged more people in Makati to drink
moderately and more responsibly? Obviously, it hasn’t
put a stop to drunk driving altogether. That might be an impossible task.
But even making a dent on the drunk-driving culture would take time,
relentless enforcement coupled with a serious information drive.

Binay directed the Makati Police Department, the
city’s Department of Public Safety and the barangays
to strictly enforce the ordinance, particularly in the vicinity of
Makati’s bars and entertainment establishments. Bar
owners were asked to inform their clients about the ordinance against
drunk driving, and its corresponding penalties.

Apparently, the advisories failed to reach former Pangasinan
congressman Ranjit Shahani, who figured in a car accident in Makati last
week. Ranjit was allegedly drunk when he rammed another car head-on.
Worse, he could only present an expired student’s
license (way back in 1992) to the responding officers.

This, along with many other similar incidents, only highlights the
need for a strongly enforced drunk-driving law that would lead to fewer
alcohol-related accidents and fatalities.

Source: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com

DUI Attorneys