California DUI Laws: Related Bills

I want to search legislature for a bill listed below.

AB 2000 – Assembly Member Goldsmith + Coauthors: Assembly Members
Ackerman, Boland, Bowler
Vehicles: driving under the influence: arrests: penalties.

AB 3003 – Assembly Member Pringle
Driver’s license test: pilot program.

SB 636 – Senator Haynes
Vehicles: driver education.

SB 1972 – Senator Watson
Vehicles: driving-under-the-influence programs.

SB 726 – Committee on Transportation (Senators Kopp (Chairman), Ayala,
Johnston, Kelley, and Monteith)
Transportation: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: Santa Cruz
Regional

AB 2285 – Assembly Member Aguiar
Vehicles: crimes: punishments.

AB 2487 – Assembly Member Firestone
Vehicles: driver’s licenses.

AB 1501 – Assembly Member Bordonaro (Coauthor: Senator Mountjoy)
Motorized bicycles: electric motor: definition.

AB 1826 – Assembly Member Boland
Driving under the influence { felony }.

AB 2356 – Assembly Member Aguiar
Vehicles: driving under the influence: gross vehicular manslaughter.

AB 1985 – Assembly Member Speier (Principal coauthor: Senator
Leslie)
Driving under the influence: reckless driving.

AB 1088 – Assembly Member Morrow
Schools: driver training instruction.

AB 32 – Assembly Member Katz
Driving under influence: commercial motor vehicles.

SB 301 – Senator Tom Campbell
Vehicles: driver’s licenses: examinations.

AB 1604 – Assembly Member Brewer
Vehicles: motorcycles.

AB 341 – Assembly Member Knowles
Motor vehicle insurance.

AB 1568 – Assembly Member Thompson
Vehicle: theft.

AB 1301 – Assembly Member Kevin Murray
Vehicles: proof of financial responsibility.

AB 3020 – Assembly Member Bowler
Transportation.

SB 317 – Senator Solis
Crimes: {- auto -} {+ vehicle +}

AB 432 – Assembly Member Rainey
Liability: negligence.

AB 2251 – Assembly Member Poochigian
Stolen vehicles: enhanced punishment: liability.

AB 650 – Assembly Member Speier (Principal coauthors: Assembly Members
Bowen, Harvey, and Kevin)
Vehicles: financial responsibility.

SB 837 – Senator Lewis
Vehicles: driving under the influence: punishments.

AB 1560 – Assembly Member Gallegos
Vehicles: traffic violator schools.

AB 2691 – Assembly Member House
Vehicular manslaughter: fetus.

AB 2150 – Assembly Member Morrissey
Vehicles: crimes: penalties.

AB 2096 – Assembly Member Tucker
Alcoholic beverages: advertising.

AB 417 – Assembly Members Burton and Johnson
Driving-under-the-influence programs.

SB 1587 – Committee on Transportation (Senators Kopp (Chairman),
Ayala, Boatwright, Hayden, Johnston, Kelley, Monteith, Polanco, and

SB 414 – Senator Thompson (Coauthor: Senator Boatwright)
Vehicles: violations: fines.

SB 975 – Committee on Judiciary (Senators Calderon (Chair), Campbell,
Leslie, Lockyer, O’Connell, and Wright)
Maintenance of the Codes.

AB 164 – Assembly Member Knight
Pupils: truancy: driver’s licenses.

SB 905 – Senator Leslie
Automobile insurance: good driver discount.

SB 769 – Senator Lockyer
Crimes: sentencing.

SB 1694 – Senator Dills
Driver improvement: vehicle insurance.

SB 2001 – Senator O’Connell
Vehicles: crimes: school grounds.

AB 2408 – Assembly Member Granlund
Vehicles: fleeing a peace officer: penalties.

AB 2005 – Assembly Member Kevin Murray
Driving offenses: penalties: probation.

SB 833 – Senator Kopp
{- Traffic control devices: Automated enforcement system -} {+ Vehicles:
crimes: enforcement +} .

AB 2117 – Assembly Member Miller
Juvenile court commissioners.

AB 1445 – Assembly Member Baca
Juveniles {- : loitering and graffiti -}.

AB 2352 – Assembly Member Speier
Vehicles: driver’s licenses: expiration: fees.

AB 2331 – Assembly Member Goldsmith {+ (Coauthor: Assembly Member
Alpert) +}
Crime: graffiti.

AB 1855 – Assembly Member Sher
Air pollution: emission limits.

SB 1433 – Senator Peace
Motor vehicle insurance.

AB 2295 – Assembly Member Sweeney (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member
Thompson)
Graffiti.

SB 121 – Senators Thompson, Petris, and Russell
Criminal procedure: voluntary intoxication defense.

SB 1562 – Senator Greene
School facilities.

AB 3480 – Assembly Member Davis
Drinking and driving: driving under the influence: reports to the
Department of Motor Vehicles.

AB 2410 – Assembly Member McPherson (Coauthor: Senator Johnston)
Vehicles: hours of service: regulations.

SB 1579 – Senator Leonard
Vehicles: driving under the influence: failure to appear.

AB 3074 – Assembly Member Boland
Juveniles: wards.

AB 1849 – Assembly Member Sher
Air pollution: emission limits.

AB 3350 – Assembly Member Knox
Sentencing: performance program.

AB 2240 – Assembly Member Battin (Principal coauthor: Senator
Leslie)
Vehicles: driving under the influence: fines and imprisonment.

ABX2 25 – Assembly Member Morrissey
Vehicles: equipment: unsafe operation.

AB 153 – Assembly Member Katz
Transportation.

AB 3316 – Assembly Member Tucker
Driving under the influence: treatment programs.

AB 964 – Assembly Member Katz
Vehicles: traffic violator schools.

AB 1869 – Assembly Member Katz
Transportation.

AB 1683 – Assembly Member Conroy (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member
Katz)
Public utilities: carriers.

SB 1162 – Senator Leslie
Vehicles: driver’s license suspension; driving under the influence.

AB 1999 – Assembly {- Member Knight -} {+ Members Knight and Morrissey
+}
Peace officer: fleeing.

SB 1367 – Senator O’Connell (Coauthor: Assembly Member
Bordonaro)
Vehicles: violations: fines.

SB 1198 – Senator Kopp
Vehicles: controlled substances.

ACR 96 – Assembly Member Katz
Bruce T. Hinman Memorial Freeway Interchange.

AB 2531 – Assembly Member Miller
Graffiti.

SB 1379 – Senator Peace
Arrest warrants.

SB 1405 – Senator Ayala
Vehicles: driving under the influence.

SB 253 – Senator Kelley
Vehicles: driving hours: emergencies.

AB 2930 – Assembly Member Escutia
Transportation.

SB 1402 – Senator Marks
Vehicles: driving under the influence: penalties.

AB 607 – Assembly Member Brulte
Insurance: motor vehicles.

AB 2740 – Assembly Members Ackerman, Isenberg, Baugh, Brewer, Conroy,
Morrissey, and Morrow
Vehicles: driving under the influence: programs.

ABX2 38 – Assembly Member Goldsmith
Minors: juvenile court jurisdiction.

AB 2686 – Assembly Member Kaloogian
Minors: juvenile court jurisdiction.

AB 2420 – Assembly Member Bowler
Vehicles.

AB 2418 – Assembly Member Woods
Vehicles: driving under the influence: penalties.

AB 1848 – Assembly Member House
Vehicles: commercial drivers: hours of service {+ : pilot program +}.

AB 129 – Assembly Member Rainey
Driving under the influence: assessments: Contra Costa County.

AB 498 – Assembly Member Horcher
Vehicles: slowing to view accident.

SB 2105 – Senator Hayden
Vehicles: tow trucks: operators.

SB 1807 – Senator Rosenthal
Automobile insurance.

AB 1637 – Assembly Member Richter
Vehicles: drivers: hours of service.

AB 232 – Assembly Member Kevin Murray
Prior conviction: burden of proof.

AB 1304 – Assembly Member Bowler
Vehicles: driver’s licenses: suspension.

SB 1005 – Senator Dills
Vehicles: driver training.

AB 1113 – Assembly Member Rogan (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member
Napolitano)
Controlled substances: {-

AB 851 – Assembly Member Hoge
Equine activities: limitation of liability.

SB 31 – Senator Leslie
Negligence.

SB 323 – Senator Kopp
Records.

AB 2839 – Assembly Member Hoge
Department of Motor Vehicles: records: Indian tribes.

AB 2723 – Assembly Member Hawkins
{- Habeas corpus -} {+ Juvenile court law +}.

SB 36 – Senator Killea
Vehicles: registration fees: vehicle-theft crimes.

AB 1752 – Assembly Member Knowles
Causes of action: insurance rates.

AB 1052 – Assembly Member Tucker
{- Satellite wagering -} {+ Equine training and racing: protective
headgear +}.

AB 2641 – Assembly Member Bowler
Motor vehicles: windshields and windows.

AB 918 – Assembly Member Cunneen
Sentencing.

SB 1263 – Senator Dills
Vehicles: traffic violator schools.

SB 185 – Senator Kopp
Public utilities: carriers.

SB 1070 – Senator Calderon
Rental cars.

SB 240 – Senator Ayala
Vehicles: towing: impoundment.

ACR 3 – Assembly Member Hannigan
Vic Fazio Freeway.

SB 2008 – Senator Mountjoy
Department of Motor Vehicles: English language.

AB 3470 – Committee on Judiciary (Assembly Members Morrow (Chairman),
Alby, Battin, Baugh, Bowen, Goldsmith, House, Kaloogian,
Maintenance of the Codes.

AB 2703 – Assembly Member Bowler
Motor carriers: incentive programs.

SB 772 – Senator Hurtt {+ (Coauthors: Senators Haynes and Lewis)
+}
Air pollution: south coast district: trip reduction plans.

AB 257 – Assembly Member Speier (Coauthors: Assembly Members Alpert,
Kuehl, and Willard Murray)
Family law: support.

SB 768 – Senators O’Connell, Ayala, Johannessen, Kelley, Leslie,
Monteith, Polanco, and Thompson
Highways: signs: services available.

AB 2370 – Assembly Member Takasugi
Vehicles: carpool lanes: prohibitions.

AB 2623 – Assembly Member Kuehl
Vehicles: carpool lanes: ZEV.

SB 1511 – Senator Monteith
Peace officer: fleeing.

AB 2360 – Assembly Member Morrissey
Vehicles: firefighting equipment: definition.

AB 2357 – Assembly Member Morrow (Principal coauthors: Assembly
Members Hauser and Mazzoni)
Liability.

AB 1493 – Assembly Member Valerie Brown
Vehicles: speed limit: rural community.

AB 700 – Assembly Member Cunneen
Liability: public agencies and employees.

SB 968 – Senator Johnston
Insurance: good drivers.

AB 1591 – Assembly Member Hannigan
Healthy Start Support Services for Children Act.

SCR 63 – Senators Thompson, Alquist, Beverly, Boatwright, Calderon,
Dills, Greene, Kopp, Lockyer, Maddy, Marks, Mello, and
Justice Joseph A. Rattigan Building.

AB 2969 – Assembly Member Olberg
Liability: public agencies and employees.

AB 875 – Assembly Member Johnson
Plea bargaining.

SB 1207 – Senator Hughes
Rental of passenger vehicles.

AB 2407 – Assembly Member Granlund
Controlled substances: plea bargaining.

AB 75 – Assembly Member Morrow
Unauthorized entry.

AB 2866 – Assembly Member Speier
Car rentals: damages waiver.

AB 770 – Assembly Member Aguiar
Vehicles: autobrokers.

SCR 28 – Senators Beverly and Rogers
50th anniversary of V-E Day.

AB 1228 – Assembly Member Martinez
Vehicles: parking and standing violations.

AB 2693 – Assembly Member Willard Murray
Peace officers: California State University.

AB 3057 – Assembly Member Hauser
Vehicles: notices to appear.

SB 501 – Senator Calderon
Air pollution: vehicles: retirement.

AB 2960 – Assembly Member Firestone
Postsecondary Education: Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education
Reform Act of 1989.

AB 135 – Assembly Member Rainey
Vehicles: registration fees.

AB 2288 – Assembly Member Aguiar
Motor vehicle speed contest: motor vehicle removal.

SB 788 – Senator Alquist
{- Elections: Budget Act of 1994: augmentation: deficiencies -} {+
Driver’s licenses: visas: +}

AB 2931 – Assembly Member Vasconcellos
Drug and alcohol abuse.

AB 2924 – Assembly Member Boland
Vehicles: proof of financial responsibility.

AB 1400 – Assembly Member Willie Brown
Vehicles: safety belts.

SB 1111 – Senator Ayala
Vehicles: abandonment: registration.

SB 526 – Senator Costa
Trademarks.

SB 1224 – Senator Mountjoy
Crimes: interstate jurisdiction.

SB 89 – Senator Alquist
1995-96 Budget.

AB 111 – Assembly Member Brulte
1995-96 Budget.

SB 1393 – Senator Thompson
1996-97 Budget.

AB 2049 – Assembly Member Caldera
1996-97 Budget.

AB 716 – Ass

Are you in need of a California DUI Lawyer?

DUI Attorneys


California DUI Arrest Chart 1982-1996

DUI Attorneys


Portable Breathalyzer O.K. for Chemical Test!

Court OKs Use of Drunk-Driving Test

Law: State appeals panel rules that evidence obtained from hand-held
gauge is admissible, even without backup data.

By PAUL ELIAS, SPECIAL TO THE TIMES

Los Angeles Times Saturday January 20, 1996
Home Edition
Part A, Page 18

VENTURA–A state appeals court has ruled that a hand-held gauge the
size of a personal radio can be used to convict drunk drivers, a decision
that could sound the death knell for a popular DUI defense.

The 2nd District Court of Appeal found that results of the preliminary
alcohol screening test that California Highway Patrol officers give to
suspected drunk drivers are admissible in court.

For five years, CHP officers have asked suspected drunk drivers to
blow into the Alco-Sensor to measure blood-alcohol levels at traffic
stops. Suspects are required to take more precise blood-alcohol tests,
usually administered at the nearest jail.

Defense attorneys have argued successfully in court that the sensor
should not be allowed as evidence because it was approved by lawmakers to
screen suspects and not as a tool to precisely determine the degree of a
driver’s intoxication.

But 2nd District justices said in a decision published this week that
juries can use the Alco-Sensor results to convict drivers, even without
more reliable backup tests.

“The Alco-Sensor is so important for the prosecution of drunken
driving,” said Ventura County Deputy Dist. Atty. Kevin DeNoce, who argued
the test case before the Court of Appeal.

DeNoce said admissibility of Alco-Sensor results will undermine a
popular defense argument that suspects’ alcohol-blood levels were below
the legal limit when stopped even though they were later found to exceed
it. That is because it takes time for alcohol to seep into the
bloodstream.

For instance, suspects measured with a blood-alcohol level of
0.08%–the standard for drunk driving–at the police station have
successfully argued that their level was significantly lower when they
were stopped.

In the Ventura County test case, CHP officers stopped Brian Keith
Bury, 24, as he drove his car slowly and erratically on the Ventura
Freeway two years ago. Bury submitted to two Alco-Sensor tests, which
indicated a blood-alcohol level of more than 0.17%.

At the County Jail, Bury refused to take any further tests. During
Bury’s trial, Ventura County Superior Court Judge Charles W. Campbell Jr.
allowed the jury to consider the Alco-Sensor results.

A jury convicted Bury of drunk driving for the fifth time in five
years. He was sentenced to four years in prison. His attorneys appealed,
arguing that the Alco-Sensor was never intended to be used as a
prosecution tool.

Bury’s trial lawyer, Steven Powell, declined to comment. Bury’s
appellate attorney, Lauri Brown, did not return calls seeking
comment.

“The ruling doesn’t surprise me, given the political climate,” said
Ventura defense attorney Jay Johnson, who specializes in drunk driving
cases. “There are three crimes I tell my clients that they don’t want to
get convicted of: rape, child molestation and drunken driving, because
they are fighting an uphill battle against public sentiment.”

Copyright, The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles Times, 1996.

DUI Attorneys


Bicyclist Cited for DUI After Being Struck by Car

California Bicyclist Cited for DUI After Being Struck by
Car

November 14, 2006

While riding his bicycle in Santa Rosa California a bicyclist was
struck by a car and suffered multiple broken bones and a cut on the back
of his head. Then, while he was being treated for his injuries at the
hospital, he was arrested on suspicion of DUI, driving his bicycle
drunk.

A police officer said that it was unclear whether the bicylist was
riding in the road lane or on the shoulder, both of which would be legal
in Santa Rosa. The automobile driver was not cited in the accident.

Source:

DUI Attorneys


California Administrative Per Se – Numbers

California Administrative Per Se – Process Measures

By the Numbers

1997/98

Prepared by DMV Research and Development Branch 11/13/98

1997/98 APS
Facts

1997/98 APS
Key Findings

Action
FY 96/97
FY 97/98
% change
Total APS actions taken (including actions later
set aside)
192,021
185,714
-3.3
Total .08 APS actions set aside
18,086
13,739
-24.0
Total .01 Suspensions set aside
857
725
-15.4
Total APS set aside rate
9.74
7.79
-20.0
Net total APS actions taken (excluding actions
later set aside)
173,078
171,250
-1.1
—–Net total .08 APS actions
163,015
157,495
-3.4
—–Net total .01 suspensions
10,063
13,755
36.7
Total APS actions taken, suspension/revocation
order served by
—–Law enforcement
183,197
175,741
-4.1
—–DMV
8,887
10,023
12.8
—–Unknown
2,485
3,610
45.5
Total APS actions, noncommerical drivers
168,478
166,644
-1.1
Total commerical CDL APS actions
4,600
4,606
.01
Number of APS CDL in commerical vehicles
16
30
87.5
APS .08 actions for drivers with no prior DUI
convictions of APS actions
—–4 month license suspension
90,983
86,501
-2.1
—–30-day suspension, plus 3 month program
restriction
1,418
1,536
8.3
—–30-day suspension, plus 5 month
restrictions
15,294
17,161
12.2
First offender chemical test refusals
6,057
5,894
-2.7
CDL first offender suspension/restriction
3,408
3,553
4.2
Total APS .08 actions taken for drivers with prior
DUI convictions
45,855
42,850
-6.5
APS Hearings
Total .08 and .01 APS hearings scheduled
32,434
33,897
4.5
Proportion of total APS scheduled hearings
16.9
18.2
7.7
.08 actions sustained or upheld following
hearing
21,468
24,777
15.4
.08 hearings held and or completed
30,012
30,916
3.0
Proportion of APS actions sustained/upheld
following a hearing
71.5
80.1
12.0
DUI Attorneys


California DUI Statistics: California Administrative Per Se

DMV – Administrative Per Se

Key Findings For 1997/1998

To the
numbers

1997/8 APS Facts

  • The number of APS actions in 1997/98 dropped just over 3% from
    last year’s total (3.3% decline).
  • There was a 36.7% increase in suspensions for young drivers
    (under age 21) pursuant to the state’s "zero tolerance law" (BAC
    > .01%).
  • The proportion of arrested DUI offenders who refused a chemical
    test continued to decline, as it has each year since FY 92/93
    (5.93% refusal rate in FY 97/98, versus a 7.69% refusal rate in FY
    92/93).
  • For the first time since the APS law was enacted, in FY 97/98
    ther was a decrease in the overall APS set aside rate. In FY %/97,
    almcet 10% of total APS actions taken resulted in the action
    ultimately being set aside, while in FY 97/98, only 7.79% of total
    APS actions were set aside. This FY 97/98 rate is more than double
    the initial 3.7% set aside rate for FY 90/91.
  • Since the APS law was enacted in 1990, the proportion of
    offenders requesting a hearing has more than doubled. The
    proportion of offenders who reqt*ested ~ DMV hearing subsequent to
    an APS action in FY 97/98 rose to a high of 18.2%, which represents
    a 7.7% increase over the prior year’s rate. The proportion of
    chemical test refusers who requested hearings remained relatively
    unchanged from last year’s total requests (les than 1%
    increase).
  • The proportion of .08 APS actions that were sustained, or
    upheld following an actual hearing increased by 12.0% over FY
    96/97. In FY 97/98, 80.1% of contested actions were sustained bythe
    DMV. The category of "Driver Safety/Driver Investigation" reviews
    continued to be usedby some Driver Safety offices to review 2,254
    APS cases, an increase of 52.0% over last ‘year’s1,448 cases. Of
    those reviewed, 71.7% were set aside representing .a decrease of
    21.0% from FY96 / 97.
  • The proportion of reat DUI offenders continued to decline in FY
    97/98, and now constitutes only 25.0% of all .08 Al’S actions.
  • There was a substantial increase (87.5%) in suspensions for
    commercial drivers driving in commercial vehicles, but the-raw
    numbers still remain very low (only 30 such drivers. suspended in
    FY 97/98).

Are you in need of a California DUI Attorney?

DUI Attorneys


California Administrative Per Se – FACTS

California Administrative Per Se – FACTS

1997/98

Prepared by DMV Research and Development Branch 11/13/98

To the
Numbers

Key
Findings

Background

In 1990, California became the 28th state to implement an immediate
driver license suspension law also referred to as an “Administrative Per
Se (APS)” or “on-the-spot” license suspension law The California APS law
requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to suspend or revoke the
driving privilege of persons who are driving with a blood alcohol
concentration (BAC) of .08% or more, or who refuse a chemical test upon
arrest. In January 1994 California implemented a companion driver license
suspension law, known as the “zero tolerance law,” which requires DMV to
suspend for one year any driver under age 21 with a BAC of .01 % or more
as measured by a preliminary alcohol screening test, or who refuses or
fails to complete the test. These administrative actions are independent
of any criminal penalties imposed in court for conviction of the
driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense. Upon arrest, or detention (as
applicable in the .01% APS law), the driver’s license is immediately
confiscated and an order of suspension or revocation served.

For either law, due process is allowed by the issuance of a 30-day
temporary license intended to provide the driver with sufficient time to
challenge the suspension through DMV administrative review. The time
allowed to challenge the suspension was reduced from 45 days on July 1,
1993. As of January 1, 1993, offenders who are dismissed for insufficient
evidence or are never charged by the court may request an APS dismissal
hearing to consider setting aside the associated APS action. Under the
.08% APS’ law, when a driver submits to and “fails” a BAC test and has no
prior DUI convictions or APS actions (within 7 years), a 4-month license
suspension Is imposed. Following, 30 days of “hard” suspension, and
providing they first demonstrate proof of insurance, show proof of
enrollment in an alcohol treatment program, and pay all penalty fees, the
law provides for such drivers to obtain either a 60-day restricted
license to drive to and from an alcohol treatment program, or (as of
January 1, 1995) a 5-month restricted license which also allows driving
to, from, and during the course of employment A 1-year suspension is
imposed on drivers having one, or more prior DUI convictions or APS
actions within 7 years, with no provision for a restricted license.

Under this law, for offenders refusing a BAC test, a 1-year license
suspension Is imposed for a first offense, a 2-year revocation Is imposed
for a second offense, and a 3-year revocation is imposed for a third or
subsequent offense (within 7 years). There are no provisions for issuance
of a restricted license following a BAC test refusal.

The .01% BAC law requires a 1-year suspension and provides for: a
hardship restriction only if the preliminary breath test was completed
and the driver can demonstrate a critical need to drive.

To prevent undue hardship, a commercial driver arrested in a
noncommercial vehicle and having no prior DUI convictions or APS actions
Isaliowed to drive to, from, and during the course of employment
following a 30-day “hard” suspension. (A noncommercial vehicle is one not
requiring a commercial driver license, or heavy-vehicle operator’s
license, to drive.) A commnercial driver arrested for DUI while driving
In a commercial vehicle receives a 1-year “hard”suspension

DUI Attorneys


AB 826

AB 826 Automobile Insurance: Notice of Cancellation or Nonrenewal

BILL NUMBER: AB 826 AMENDED 06/30/97

AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 30, 1997
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 19, 1997
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 24, 1997

INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Thomson
FEBRUARY 27, 1997

An act to amend Section 1861.03 of the Insurance Code, relating to
insurance.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 826, as amended, Thomson. Automobile insurance: notice of
cancellation or nonrenewal.

Existing law provides that a notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of a
policy of automobile insurance shall be effective only if it is based
upon specified reasons one of which may be a substantial increase in the
hazard insured against, except as specified.

This bill would provide that a violation of certain alcohol related
offenses is, per se, a substantial increase in the hazard insured
against. The bill would also make a statement of legislative intent.

The bill amends a provision contained in Proposition 103 which
provides for amendment only to further its purposes and by a 2/3
vote.

Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated
local program: no.

SECTION 1. Section 1861.03 of the Insurance Code is amended to
read:

1861.03. (a) The business of insurance shall be subject to the laws of
California applicable to any other business, including, but not limited
to, the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Sections 51 to 53, inclusive, of the
Civil Code), and the antitrust and unfair business practices laws (Parts
2 (commencing with Section 16600) and 3 (commencing with Section 17500)
of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code).

(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit (1) any
agreement to collect, compile and disseminate historical data on paid
claims or reserves for reported claims, provided such data is
contemporaneously transmitted to the commissioner, (2) participation in
any joint arrangement established by statute or the commissioner to
assure availability of insurance, (3) any agent or broker, representing
one or more insurers, from obtaining from any insurer it represents
information relative to the premium for any policy or risk to be
underwritten by that insurer, (4) any agent or broker from disclosing to
an insurer it represents any quoted rate or charge offered by another
insurer represented by that agent or broker for the purpose of
negotiating a lower rate, charge, or term from the insurer to whom the
disclosure is made, or (5) any agents, brokers, or insurers from
utilizing or participating with multiple insurers or reinsurers for
underwriting a single risk or group of risks.

(c) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a notice of
cancellation or nonrenewal of a policy for automobile insurance shall be
effective only if it is based on one or more of the following reasons:
(A) nonpayment of premium; (B) fraud or material misrepresentation
affecting the policy or insured; (C) a substantial increase in the hazard
insured against. A violation of any alcohol related offense specified in
Sections 23152 and 23153, or Section 23220, 23221, 23222, 23224, or 23226
of the Vehicle Code, shall, per se, be deemed a substantial increase in
the hazard insured against, provided the person does not otherwise
qualify to purchase a good driver discount policy pursuant to Section
1861.025.

(2) This subdivision shall not prevent a reciprocal insurer, organized
prior to November 8, 1988, by a motor club holding a certificate of
authority under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 12160) of Part 5 of
Division 2, and which requires membership in the motor club as a
condition precedent to applying for insurance, from issuing an effective
notice of nonrenewal based solely on the failure of the insured to
maintain membership in the motor club. This subdivision shall also not
prevent an insurer which issues private passenger automobile coverage to
members of groups that were in existence prior to November 8, 1988,
whether membership, franchise, or otherwise, and to those who are not
members of groups from issuing an effective notice of nonrenewal for
coverage provided to the insured as a member of the group based solely on
the failure of the insured to maintain that membership if (i) the insurer
offers to renew the coverage to the insured on a nongroup basis, or (ii)
to transfer the coverage to an affiliated insurer. The rates charged by
the insurer or affiliated insurer shall have been adopted pursuant to
this article. However, all of the following conditions shall be
applicable to that insurance:

(A) Membership, if conditioned, is conditioned only on timely payment
of membership dues and other bona fide criteria not based upon driving
record or insurance, provided that membership in a motor club may not be
based on residence in any area within the state.

(B) Membership dues are paid solely for and in consideration of the
membership and membership benefits and bear a reasonable relationship to
the benefits provided. The amount of the dues shall not depend on whether
the member purchases insurance offered by the membership organization.
None of those membership dues or any portion thereof shall be transferred
by the membership organization to the insurer, or any affiliate of the
insurer, attorney-in-fact, subsidiary, or holding company thereof,
provided that this provision shall not prevent any bona fide transaction
between the membership organization and those entities.

(C) Membership provides bona fide services or benefits in addition to
the right to apply for insurance. Those services shall be reasonably
available to all members within each class of membership.

Any insurer that violates subparagraphs subparagraph (A), (B), or (C)
shall be subject to the penalties set forth in Section 1861.14.

SEC. 2. In enacting this act, it is the intent of the Legislature that
a substantial increase in the hazard insured against exists with respect
to a violation of Sections 23220, 23221, 23222, and 23226 of the Vehicle
Code referred to in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 1861.03
of the Insurance Code, as amended by this act, only where a person is
driving upon, or the vehicle is upon, a highway.

DUI Attorneys


AB 650 Vehicles

AB 650 Vehicles: Financial Responsibility

BILL NUMBER: AB 650 CHAPTERED 09/30/96

CHAPTER 1126

FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
PASSED THE ASSEMBLY AUGUST 30, 1996
PASSED THE SENATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1995
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 28, 1995
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 22, 1995
AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 21, 1995
AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 3, 1995
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 26, 1995
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 4, 1995
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 20, 1995
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 27, 1995

INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Speier (Principal coauthors:
Assembly Members Bowen, Harvey, and Kevin Murray) (Coauthors: Assembly
Members Alpert, Goldsmith, Kuehl, McDonald, Mazzoni, and Willard
Murray) (Coauthors: Senators Costa and Thompson)

FEBRUARY 21, 1995

An act to amend, repeal, and add Sections 16020, 16070, 16071,
16457, and 40611 of, and to add and repeal Sections 1680, 4000.37,
16028, 16029, 16030, and 16033 of, the Vehicle Code, relating to
vehicles.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 650, Speier. Vehicles: financial responsibility.

(1) Existing law imposes various duties on the Department of Motor
Vehicles relating to vehicles.

This bill would require the department to require, upon application
for renewal of registration of a vehicle, any one of several forms of
evidence that the applicant is in compliance with the financial
responsibility laws of this state, except as specified.

The bill would make technical, clarifying changes in related
provisions of law.

(2) Existing law requires every driver and every owner of a motor
vehicle to be able, at all times, to establish financial
responsibility, as defined, for the vehicle.

This bill would require every person who drives upon a highway a
motor vehicle required to be registered in this state to provide
evidence of financial responsibility for the vehicle upon demand of a
peace officer, as specified.

The bill would make a violation of the financial responsibility
provision specified above an infraction, punishable by specified fines,
and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program by creating a
new crime.

The bill would authorize a court to order the impounding of the
vehicle of a person who violates the financial responsibility
provision, in addition to the penalties specified above. The bill would
authorize the release of an impounded vehicle to the legal owner or
registered owner of the vehicle under specified circumstances.

The bill would authorize dismissal of charges related to violation
of the financial responsibility provision upon receipt of written
evidence of financial responsibility, as defined, by the clerk of the
court and would authorize the clerk to collect a $10 transaction fee
for each case so dismissed.

The bill would exempt a person from the provisions described above
if the person was driving, with the permission of the person’s
employer, a motor vehicle owned, operated, or leased by that employer,
would make the provision applicable to the employer, and would require
a notice to appear issued pursuant to the above provision to be issued
to the employer rather than the driver. The bill would require the
driver to notify the employer of the receipt of the notice to appear
not later than 5 days after receipt. Because a violation of the
provision requiring notification of the employer would be an
infraction, the bill would create a new crime and would thus impose a
state-mandated local program.

The bill would prohibit a person from knowingly providing false
evidence of financial responsibility when requested by a peace officer
pursuant to the financial responsibility provision specified above. The
bill would make a violation of the provision relating to providing
false evidence a misdemeanor, punishable by specified fines and a
specified term in the county jail, and would thereby impose a
state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.

The bill would prohibit a peace officer from stopping a vehicle for
the sole purpose of determining whether the vehicle is being driven in
violation of the financial responsibility provision.

The bill would provide that no public entity or employee, or any
specified person or organization, is liable for any loss, detriment, or
injury resulting from failure to request evidence of financial
responsibility or inaccurately recording that evidence, as specified,
or as a result of the driver producing false or inaccurate financial
responsibility information.

The bill would require the Director of Motor Vehicles, if the
operation of any of the provisions specified above is delayed or
interrupted by the action of a state or federal court and the
constitutionality of the provision is upheld by a final decision of the
court, to calculate what amount of time the operation of the provision
was delayed or interrupted by the court’s action, add the amount
calculated to January 1, 2000, to determine a new repeal date for the
challenged provision, and notify the Secretary of State in writing of
the new repeal date.

The bill would become operative on January 1, 1997, and would remain
in effect only until January 1, 2000, or until the date determined by
the director pursuant to the provision specified above, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

The bill would provide that its provisions are severable.

(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.

(4) The bill would become operative only if SB 49 is enacted and
becomes operative.

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:

(a) Driving is a privilege and not a right.

(b) Testimony has been presented to the Legislature that proves that
the injuries of victims of uninsured motorists are so grave as to shock
the public conscience, and this testimony also reveals that these
injuries include death, extreme financial hardship, permanent physical
disability, and emotional trauma.

(c) Law enforcement in California is prevented from effectively
enforcing the vehicle financial responsibility laws because there is no
authority to establish evidence of financial responsibility at the time
of a traffic stop, and only limited authority to establish evidence
after an accident, and this lack of authority has led to at least 28
percent of all vehicles on the roadways being out of compliance with
California’s existing law requiring financial responsibility.

(d) The towing of a vehicle under this act is not intended by the
Legislature to be a punishment of the driver or owner of the vehicle.
Fines have been established by the Legislature to punish persons who
violate the financial responsibility laws. The towing is, instead,
intended to protect the public against grievous bodily injury or death
that may be caused by a vehicle when it is operated upon the public
roadways in violation of California’s existing law that requires that
financial responsibility be demonstrated by the owner or driver before
the vehicle is operated upon the public roadways.

SEC. 2. Section 1680 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

1680. (a) If the operation of Section 4000.37, 16020, 16028, 16029,
16030, 16033, 16070, 16071, 16457, 22651, or 40611 is delayed or
interrupted by the action of a state or federal court and the
constitutionality of that section is upheld by a final decision of the
court, the director shall do all of the following:

(1) Calculate what amount of time the operation of the section was
delayed or interrupted by the court’s action.

(2) Add the amount calculated pursuant to paragraph (1) to January
1, 2000, to determine a new repeal date for the section.

(3) Notify the Secretary of State in writing of the repeal date
calculated pursuant to paragraph (2) and state that the notice is being
made pursuant to this section.

(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which
is enacted on or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that
date.

SEC. 3. Section 4000.37 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

4000.37. (a) Upon application for renewal of registration of a
vehicle, the department shall require that the applicant submit either
the form specified in paragraph (1) or any one of the items specified
in paragraph (2) as evidence that the applicant is in compliance with
the financial responsibility laws of this state:

(1) A form developed by the department that includes all of the
following:

(A) The name and address of the applicant.

(B) The year, make, model, and vehicle identification number of the
vehicle.

(C) The name, insurer’s identification number, and address of the
insurance company or surety company providing a policy or bond for the
vehicle.

(D) The effective date and expiration date of the policy or
bond.

(E) A statement from the insurance company or surety company that
the policy or bond meets the requirements of Section 16056 or
16500.5.

(2) Any of the following:

(A) A statement that the department has issued a certificate of
self-insurance to the applicant pursuant to Section 16053, and the
number of the certificate.

(B) A copy of a certificate or deposit number of a cash deposit that
meets the requirements of Section 16054.2.

(C) An insurance covering note issued pursuant to Section 382 of the
Insurance Code.

(D) A statement that the vehicle is owned or leased by, or under the
direction of, the United States or any public entity that is included
in Section 811.2 of the Government Code.

(E) A notice issued pursuant to Section 16058.

(b) This section does not apply to a vehicle for which a
certification has been filed pursuant to Section 4604, until the
vehicle is registered for operation on the highway.

(c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(d) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 4. Section 16020 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:

16020. (a) Every driver and every owner of a motor vehicle shall at
all times be able to establish financial responsibility pursuant to
Section 16021, and shall at all times carry in the vehicle evidence of
the form of financial responsibility in effect for the vehicle.

(b) “Evidence of financial responsibility” means any of the
following:

(1) The name of the insurance or surety company that issued a policy
or bond for the vehicle that meets the requirements of Section 16056
and is currently in effect, and the number of the insurance policy or
surety bond.

(2) If the owner is a self-insurer, as provided in Section 16052 or
a depositor, as provided in Section 16054.2, the certificate or deposit
number issued by the department.

(3) An insurance covering note, as specified in Section 382 of the
Insurance Code.

(4) A showing that the vehicle is owned or leased by, or under the
direction of, the United States or any public entity, as defined in
Section 811.2 of the Government Code.

(c) For purposes of this section, “evidence of financial
responsibility” also includes either of the following:

(1) The number of an insurance policy or surety bond that was in
effect at the time of the accident, if that information is contained in
the vehicle registration records of the department.

(2) The identifying symbol issued to a highway carrier by the Public
Utilities Commission pursuant to Section 3543 of the Public Utilities
Code and displayed on the motor vehicle.

(d) For purposes of this section, “evidence of financial
responsibility” shall be in writing, and established by writing the
name of the insurance company or surety company and the policy number
on the vehicle registration card issued by the department.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(f) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 5. Section 16020 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16020. (a) Every driver and every owner of a motor vehicle shall at
all times be able to establish financial responsibility pursuant to
Section 16021, and shall at all times carry in the vehicle evidence of
the form of financial responsibility in effect for the vehicle.

(b) “Evidence of financial responsibility” means any of the
following:

(1) The name of the insurance or surety company that issued a policy
or bond for the vehicle that meets the requirements of Section 16056
and is currently in effect, and the number of the insurance policy or
surety bond.

(2) If the owner is a self-insurer, as provided in Section 16052 or
a depositor, as provided in Section 16054.2, the certificate or deposit
number issued by the department.

(3) An insurance covering note, as specified in Section 382 of the
Insurance Code.

(4) A showing that the vehicle is owned or leased by, or under the
direction of, the United States or any public entity, as defined in
Section 811.2 of the Government Code.

(c) For purposes of this section, “evidence of financial
responsibility” also includes the identifying symbol issued to a
highway carrier by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Section
3543 of the Public Utilities Code and displayed on the motor
vehicle.

(d) For purposes of this section, “evidence of financial
responsibility” shall be in writing, and established by writing the
name of the insurance company or surety company and the policy number
on the vehicle registration card issued by the department.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2000, or on
the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later.

SEC. 6. Section 16028 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16028. (a) Upon demand of a peace officer pursuant to subdivision
(b) or (c), every person who drives upon a highway a motor vehicle
required to be registered in this state shall provide evidence of
financial responsibility for the vehicle. However, a peace officer
shall not stop a vehicle for the sole purpose of determining whether
the vehicle is being driven in violation of this subdivision.

(b) Whenever a notice to appear is issued for any alleged violation
of this code, except a violation specified in Chapter 9 (commencing
with Section 22500) of Division 11 or any local ordinance adopted
pursuant thereto, the cited driver shall furnish written evidence of
financial responsibility upon request of the peace officer issuing the
citation. The peace officer shall request and write the driver’s
evidence of financial responsibility on the notice to appear, except
where the peace officer is unable to write the driver’s evidence of
financial responsibility on the notice to appear due to an emergency
that requires his or her presence elsewhere. If the cited driver fails
to provide evidence of financial responsibility at the time the notice
to appear is issued, the peace officer may issue the driver a notice to
appear for violation of subdivision (a). The notice to appear for
violation of subdivision (a) shall be written on the same citation form
as the original violation.

(c) Whenever a peace officer is summoned to the scene of an accident
described in Section 16000, the driver of any motor vehicle that is in
any manner involved in the accident shall furnish written evidence of
financial responsibility upon the request of the peace officer. If the
driver fails to provide evidence of financial responsibility when
requested, the peace officer may issue the driver a notice to appear
for violation of subdivision (a).

(d) (1) If, at the time a notice to appear for a violation of
subdivision (a) is issued, the person is driving a motor vehicle owned,
operated, or leased by the driver’s employer, and the vehicle is being
driven with the permission of the employer, this section shall apply to
the employer rather than the driver. In that case, a notice to appear
shall be issued to the employer rather than the driver, and the driver
may sign the notice on behalf of the employer.

(2) The driver shall notify the employer of the receipt of the
notice issued pursuant to paragraph (1) not later than five days after
receipt.

(e) A person issued a notice to appear for a violation of
subdivision (a) may personally appear before the clerk of the court, as
designated in the notice to appear, and provide written evidence of
financial responsibility in a form consistent with Section 16020,
showing that the driver was in compliance with that section at the time
the notice to appear for violating subdivision (a) was issued. In lieu
of a personal appearance, the person may submit written evidence of
financial responsibility by mail to the court. Upon receipt by the
clerk of written evidence of financial responsibility in a form
consistent with Section 16020, further proceedings on the notice to
appear for the violation of subdivision (a) shall be dismissed.

(f) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 7. Section 16029 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16029. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a violation of
subdivision (a) of Section 16028 is an infraction and shall be punished
as follows:

(a) Upon a first conviction, by a fine of not less than five hundred
dollars ($500) and not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

(b) Upon a subsequent conviction, occurring within three years of a
prior conviction, by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars
($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000).

(c) (1) At the discretion of the court, for good cause, and in
addition to the penalties specified in subdivisions (a) and (b), the
court may order the impoundment of the vehicle for which the owner
could not produce evidence of financial responsibility in violation of
subdivision (a) of Section 16028.

(2) A vehicle impounded pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be released
to the legal owner of the vehicle or the legal owner’s agent if all of
the following conditions are met:

(A) The legal owner is a motor vehicle dealer, bank, credit union,
acceptance corporation, or other licensed financial institution legally
operating in this state.

(B) The legal owner or the legal owner’s agent pays all towing and
storage fees related to the seizure of the vehicle.

(C) The legal owner or the legal owner’s agent presents foreclosure
documents or an affidavit of repossession for the vehicle.

(3) (A) A legal owner or the legal owner’s agent that obtains
release of the vehicle pursuant to paragraph (2) shall not release the
vehicle to the registered owner of the vehicle or any agents of the
registered owner, unless the registered owner is a rental car agency,
except upon presentation of evidence of financial responsibility, as
defined in Section 16020, for the vehicle. The legal owner or the legal
owner’s agent shall make every reasonable effort to ensure that the
evidence of financial responsibility that is presented is valid.

(B) Prior to relinquishing the vehicle, the legal owner may require
the registered owner to pay all towing and storage charges related to
impoundment and any administrative charges authorized under Section
22850.5 that were incurred by the legal owner in connection with
obtaining custody of the vehicle.

(4) A vehicle impounded under paragraph (1) shall be released to a
rental car agency if the agency is either the legal owner or the
registered owner of the vehicle and the agency pays all towing and
storage fees related to the seizure of the vehicle.

(5) A vehicle impounded under paragraph (1) shall be released to the
registered owner of the vehicle only upon presentation of evidence of
financial responsibility, as defined in Section 16020, for that
vehicle, and evidence that all towing and storage fees related to the
seizure of the vehicle are paid.

This paragraph does not apply to a person, entity, or agency who is
entitled to release of a vehicle under paragraph (2) or (4) and is
either:

(A) The registered and the legal owner and is described in
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2).

(B) The registered owner or legal owner and is described in
paragraph (4).

(d) It is the intent of the Legislature that fines collected
pursuant to this section be used to reduce the number of uninsured
drivers and not be used to generate revenue for general purposes.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(f) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 8. Section 16030 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16030. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), any person who
knowingly provides false evidence of financial responsibility (1) when
requested by a peace officer pursuant to Section 16028 or (2) to the
clerk of the court as permitted by subdivision (e) of Section 16028,
including an expired or canceled insurance policy, bond, or certificate
or deposit number, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not
exceeding seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) or imprisonment in the
county jail not exceeding 30 days, or by both that fine and
imprisonment. The court shall additionally suspend the driver’s license
of any person convicted of a violation of this subdivision for a period
of one year commencing upon the date of the conviction, in accordance
with Sections 13206 and 13207. Driver’s licenses surrendered to the
court pursuant to this section shall be transmitted by the court,
together with the required report of the conviction, to the department
within 10 days of the conviction. Upon conclusion of the period of
suspension, the department shall not return the driver’s license until
the licensee provides evidence of financial responsibility, as defined
in Section 16020.

(b) However, in lieu of suspending a person’s driving privileges
pursuant to subdivision (a), the court shall restrict the person’s
driving privileges to driving that is required in the person’s course
of employment, if driving of a motor vehicle is necessary in order to
perform the duties of the person’s primary employment. The restriction
shall remain in effect for the period of suspension otherwise required
by subdivision (a). The court shall provide for endorsement of the
restriction on the person’s driver’s license, and violation of the
restriction constitutes a violation of Section 14603 and grounds for
suspension or revocation of the license under Section 13360.

(c) This section does not apply to a driver who is driving a motor
vehicle owned, operated, or leased by the employer of the driver and
driven with the permission of the employer.

(d) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 9. Section 16033 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16033. (a) No public entity or employee, or any person or
organization authorized under Section 4610 to endorse receipts or
validate registration cards or potential registration cards, is liable
for any loss, detriment, or injury resulting directly or indirectly
from failure to request evidence of financial responsibility or
inaccurately recording that evidence under Section 16028 or as a result
of the driver producing false or inaccurate financial responsibility
information.

(b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(c) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 10. Section 16070 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:

16070. (a) Whenever a driver involved in an accident described in
Section 16000 fails to provide evidence of financial responsibility as
required by Section 16020 at the time of the accident, the department
shall pursuant to subdivision (b) suspend the privilege of the driver
or owner to drive a motor vehicle, including the driving privilege of a
nonresident in this state.

(b) Whenever the department receives an accident report pursuant to
this article which alleges that any of the drivers involved in the
accident was not in compliance with Section 16020 at the time of the
accident, the department shall immediately mail to that driver a notice
of intent to suspend the driving privilege of that driver. The
department shall suspend the driving privilege 30 days after mailing
the notice, unless the driver has, prior to that date, established
financial responsibility at the time of the accident, as specified in
Section 16021, with the department. The suspension notice shall notify
the driver of the action taken and the right to a hearing under Section
16075.

(c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(d) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 11. Section 16070 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16070. (a) Whenever a driver involved in an accident described in
Section 16000 fails to prove the existence of financial responsibility
as required by Section 16020 at the time of the accident, the
department shall, pursuant to subdivision (b), suspend the privilege of
the driver or owner to drive a motor vehicle, including the driving
privilege of a nonresident in this state.

(b) Whenever the department receives an accident report pursuant to
this article which alleges that any of the drivers involved in the
accident was not in compliance with Section 16020 at the time of the
accident, the department shall immediately mail to that driver a notice
of intent to suspend the driving privilege of that driver. The
department shall suspend the driving privilege 30 days after mailing
the notice, unless the driver has, prior to that date, established
proof of financial responsibility at the time of the accident, as
specified in Section 16021, with the department. The suspension notice
shall notify the driver of the action taken and the right to a hearing
under Section 16075.

(c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2000, or on
the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later.

SEC. 12. Section 16071 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:

16071. (a) The department shall suspend the driving privilege of any
person upon receiving notice from another state that the person’s
driving privilege in that state has been suspended for failure to meet
the financial responsibility provisions of the law in that state, if
the suspension in that state was taken on grounds that would have
resulted in a suspension in this state.

(b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(c) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 13. Section 16071 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16071. (a) The department shall suspend the driving privilege of any
person upon receiving notice from another state that the person’s
driving privilege in that state has been suspended for failure to meet
the proof of financial responsibility provisions of the law in that
state, if the suspension in that state was taken on grounds that would
have resulted in a suspension in this state.

(b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2000, or on
the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later.

SEC. 14. Section 16457 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:

16457. (a) Whenever proof of financial responsibility is required to
be filed pursuant to this chapter, no person of whom that proof is
required shall drive any motor vehicle not covered by the certificate
of proof of financial responsibility filed by him or her with the
department, nor shall any applicant for that proof knowingly fail to
disclose ownership of a motor vehicle in the application for proof of
financial responsibility or to disclose any subsequently acquired motor
vehicle.

(b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(c) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 15. Section 16457 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

16457. (a) Whenever proof of financial responsibility is required to
be filed pursuant to Section 16432, no person of whom that proof is
required shall drive any motor vehicle not covered by the certificate
of proof of financial responsibility filed by him or her with the
department, nor shall any applicant for that proof knowingly fail to
disclose ownership of a motor vehicle in the application for proof of
financial responsibility or to disclose any subsequently acquired motor
vehicle.

(b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2000, or on
the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later.

SEC. 16. Section 40611 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:

40611. Upon proof of correction of an alleged violation of Section
12500 or 12951, or any violation cited pursuant to Section 40610, or
upon submission of evidence of financial responsibility pursuant to
subdivision (e) of Section 16028, the clerk shall collect a ten dollar
($10) transaction fee for each case. The fee shall be deposited by the
clerk in accordance with Section 68084 of the Government Code, and
allocated monthly as follows:

(a) Thirty-three percent shall be transferred to the local
governmental entity in whose jurisdiction the citation was issued for
deposit in the general fund of the entity.

(b) Thirty-four percent shall be transferred to the State Treasury
for deposit in the State Penalty Fund established by Section 1464 of
the Penal Code.

(c) Thirty-three percent shall be deposited in the county general
fund.

(d) No fee shall be imposed pursuant to this section if the
violation notice is processed only by the issuing agency and no record
of the action is transmitted to the court.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1997.

(f) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2000,
or until the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later, and as of that
date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted on
or before January 1, 2000, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 17. Section 40611 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

40611. Upon proof of correction of an alleged violation of Section
12500 or 12951, or any violation cited pursuant to Section 40610, the
clerk shall collect a ten dollar ($10) transaction fee for each case.
The fee shall be deposited by the clerk in accordance with Section
68084 of the Government Code, and allocated monthly as follows:

(a) Thirty-three percent shall be transferred to the local
governmental entity in whose jurisdiction the citation was issued for
deposit in the general fund of the entity.

(b) Thirty-four percent shall be transferred to the State Treasury
for deposit in the State Penalty Fund established by Section 1464 of
the Penal Code.

(c) Thirty-three percent shall be deposited in the county general
fund.

(d) No fee shall be imposed pursuant to this section if the
violation notice is processed only by the issuing agency and no record
of the action is transmitted to the court.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2000, or on
the date determined by the director pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 1680, whichever is later.

SEC. 18. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the
only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district
will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction,
eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or
infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code,
or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless
otherwise specified, the provisions of this act shall become operative
on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the California
Constitution.

SEC. 19. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision
of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall
not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application.

SEC. 20. This act shall become operative only if Senate Bill 49 is
enacted and becomes operative.

DUI Attorneys


AB 1168

AB 1168 Vehicles: Driving Under the Influence: Profile.

BILL NUMBER: AB 1168 AMENDED 05/01/97

AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 1, 1997

INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Kaloogian
FEBRUARY 28, 1997

An act to add Section 1463.21 to the Penal Code, and to add Section
23206.3 to the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1168, as amended, Kaloogian. Vehicles: driving under the influence:
profile.

(1) Under existing law, a person who is convicted of driving a vehicle
while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, any drug, or both,
driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration, or driving when
addicted to any drug, is required to be punished by specified
imprisonment and fines. The punishment is enhanced upon the 2nd and
subsequent convictions occurring within 7 years.

This bill would, with respect to a person who is convicted of a 2nd or
subsequent violation, require a court to cause a copy of the person’s
profile, as specified, to be published, to pay the costs associated with
that publication, and notify the Department of Justice of that conviction
and to require that person to pay a $50 $100 fee to be used to pay the
costs incurred by court personnel in administering this provision,
thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The bill would require
the Department of Justice to cause a copy of the person’s profile to be
published, as prescribed.

(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement,
including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs
of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures
for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory
provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.

SECTION 1. Section 1463.21 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

1463.21. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all fees
collected under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 23206.3 of
the Vehicle Code shall be transmitted to the county treasurer and an
amount equal to the amount transmitted shall be used exclusively to pay
the costs incurred by court personnel in administering Section 23206.3 of
the Vehicle Code.

SEC. 2. Section 23206.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

23206.3. (a) If any person is convicted of a violation of Section
23152 or 23153 and the most recent offense is a second or subsequent
offense that is punishable under Section 23165, 23170, 23175, 23180,
23185, or 23190, the court shall, in addition to the imposition of any
other punishment, undertake the following:

(1) Cause the person’s profile to be published in accordance with
this section.

(2) Order the person to pay the actual costs for the publication
of the profile.

(3) Order the person to pay a fee of fifty dollars
($50)

(1) Notify the Department of Justice of that conviction.

(2) Order the person to pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100) in
order to defray the costs incurred by court personnel in undertaking the
administration of this section.

(b) The profile of that person shall Department of Justice shall cause
the person’s profile to be published once in the legal notices section of
a newspaper of general circulation in the community where the convicted
person resides , and shall pay for any costs associated with that
publication .

(c) The profile shall contain the photograph of the person and the
person’s name, birth date, and city or community of residence, the total
number of convictions for violations of Section 23152 or 23153, or both,
and the most recent fine and sentence imposed or the terms and conditions
of probation.

(d) If the court grants probation to a person under Section 23166,
23171, 23176, 23181, 23186, or 23191, the court shall require that the
person, as a term and condition of the probation, comply with this
section.

SEC. 3. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government Code, if the
Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs
mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school
districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing
with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. If
the statewide cost of the claim for reimbursement does not exceed one
million dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from the State
Mandates Claims Fund.

Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless otherwise
specified, the provisions of this act shall become operative on the same
date that the act takes effect pursuant to the California
Constitution.

DUI Attorneys