DUI Lawyers and DUI Attorneys
DUI Home DUI DUI Articles, News & Information New Jersey DWI Library State v. Chun New Jersey Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Breathtest Equipment
Document Actions

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Breathtest Equipment

Court says law enforcement can use device during NJ DWI stops.

In a landmark case, affecting tens of thousands of NJ DWI cases, the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that new breath test equipment is “sufficiently scientifically” reliable enough to determine whether a motorist is driving while intoxicated.

The ruling focuses on use of the Alcotest 7110, which is used in 17 of the state’s 21 counties to determine blood alcohol content in NJ drunk driving cases. The 7110 replaces the Breathalyzer, which was first developed in 1954.

Challenges to the new equipment were lead by New Jersey DWI defense attorney Evan Levow. At issue was the accuracy of the computerized tester. Levow says the Alcotest 7110 has problems that can violate a driver’s constitutional rights. High breath temperatures could result in false high blood alcohol content readings and the filing of inaccurate charges of driving while intoxicated in New Jersey.

The high court ruling comes after public hearings and two reports that found the Alcotest “much more reliable” than the previous testing equipment. The state said it needs the new device because maintenance parts are not available for the outdated Breathalyzer. The Alcotest was first used in New Jersey seven years ago and the state attorney general began seeking certification of the equipment in 2003. The legal challenge resolved by the recent ruling was started in January 2006.

During the two year review and debate over the accuracy of the Alcotest, 10,708 New Jersey DWI convictions have been on hold. The Supreme Court found breath test evidence gathered from use of the equipment is admissible in court. It says though that police and prosecutors must follow several safeguards. DWI lawyer Levow pointed out that the issue is especially critical because drunk driving cases in New Jersey are heard by judges, not juries, and there is a heavy reliance on breath test results.

New Jersey DWI attorney Evan Levow plans to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Posted Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Filed in DUI NewsNew Jersey DUIState v. Chun  | Permalink |  Comments (0)
del.icio.us   Digg   Yahoo   Google   Spurl
A Library of DUI New's, Articles and Drunk Driving Research

 Subscribe in a reader

DUI NewsIn the News
Drunk Driving Related Headlines and News

Topics: DUI NewsRelated DUI StroriesCelebrities DUI Charges

Legal Legal
DUI Laws and Drunk Driving Court Decisions

Alcohol and Drugs Alcohol and Drugs
Dependencies, Drug Abuse and Health Issues

Topics: Health Costs Treatment Use and Abuse

BACBAC
Blood Alcohol Content Information


Fatalities and AccidentsFatalities and Accidents
Drunk Driving Accident Statistics and Stories
Topics: Statistics

Drunk Driving VictimsVictims of Drunk Driving
Victims of Drunk Driving Articles and Information

MinorsMinors
DUI Laws and Prevention Dealing With Under Age Drinking

PreventionPrevention
Programs and Laws Attempting to Prevent Drunk Driving
Topics: MADD

ResearchResearch
Alcohol History, DUI Laws and Drunk Driving Related Information

Federal DUIFederal DUI
DUI Laws Pertaining to Pilots and Other Federal DUI Information

ForeignForeign
Alcohol, Drugs and Drunk Driving Worldwide

Peculiar Peculiar Drunk Driving Articles
Unusual and One of a Kind Drunk Driving Articles