Drivers Under 21
- the Secretary of State's office will revoke your driving privileges for a minimum of two years. A second DUI conviction will result in a license revocation for a minimum of five years or until you reach age 21, whichever is longer. A third DUI conviction, which is a Class 4 felony, will result in a minimum 10-year revocation. A fourth DUI conviction will result in a lifetime revocation. Your license also will be suspended for conviction of illegal transportation or possession of alcohol.
- the Secretary of State's office may issue you a restricted license after one year, but under no conditions will an RDP be issued until the age of 16. This license may be used between the hours of 5 a.m. and 9 p.m. or as otherwise provided. It is valid for one year. Then, you would be evaluated again by the Secretary of State's office.
- you may be fined up to $2,500 and given a jail sentence of up to one year.
- you may be directed to participate in a Youthful Intoxicated Driver's Visitation Program.
If you are under 21 and are arrested for any traffic violation and found to have a trace of alcohol in your system while operating a motor vehicle, your driving privileges will be suspended for three months. If you refuse to submit to testing, your driving privileges will be suspended for six months. If you are a second offender, your privileges will be suspended for 12 months if you fail or 24 months if you refuse to test. Your suspension begins on the 46th day from the notice date and will not be terminated until you pay the reinstatement fee and your record is updated. If you were suspended prior to age 18, you will be required to successfully complete a driver remedial education course to make your driving privileges valid again. In addition, you may be required to submit to a complete driver's license examination to be re-issued a driver's license. A traffic stop for Zero Tolerance can be upgraded to a DUI arrest depending on test results or a test refusal, at the discretion of the investigating officer.
Any person under the age of 21 that is convicted of illegal consumption, attempting to purchase or possession of alcohol, or accepting an alcoholic beverage as a gift, will lose their driving privileges for one year.
Tags:
Filed in Underage Drinking | Illinois DUI | Permalink | Comments (19)
hopefully it's helpful to you,also that article on top tagged
Illegal consumption is useful and it shows that had he been arrested for an "actual" DUI , the revokation would've been considerably longer for a first offense < 2 years > and for a second offense < 5 years > HOWEVER,down here it says the MAXIMUM suspension in your son's case is 1 year!so if they refuse to reinstate it after a year has passed,you might want to look into getting some legal help to make sure the cops didn't screw him over in their report.
Loss of Driving Privileges for Alcohol Violations by Minors
("Use/Lose Laws")
Type(s) of violation leading to driver's license suspension, revocation, or denial:
• underage purchase
• underage possession
• underage consumption
Use/lose penalties apply to minors under age 21
Authority to impose driver's license sanction: discretionary
Length of suspension/revocation:
minimum: 0 days
maximum: 365 days
I know it sounds INSANE to suspend your driver license for a reason that has absolutely NOTHING to do with driving but this is what we've come to in this country! good luck
It sounds like it is too late. You should have hired an experienced attorney. Perhaps you can appeal?
If the state, county officials, and law officers truly cared about making IL safer for all; allowing 20 year olds into bars, and placing undercover police in them will not solve the problem. Rather placing uniformed offices in the bars would deter student from them, in effect lowering the number of underage consumption tickets. Rather than placing police cars in allies behind the bars, try placing them in plain view and see how many tickets are given out. By raiding bars with undercover officers I feel it turns a serious matter into another way for the state to extract money from college students.
I find this law to be a discreditable in that it ignores one of the supreme courts guiding principles: the punishment must fit the crime. It seems to me after speaking to several city attorneys, lawyers, and general public that this law needs to be revised. What gets me is the numerous government employed people that are enforcing issues they do not agree with solely because it’s there job. Personally I would not want a job that involves me enforcing things I know to be wrong. I believe that as intelligent human beings we must evaluate our decisions and act only upon the things we truly believe in.
For those in positions of power regarding this issue I ask you to do what you believe to be right and fair by implementing punishments that fit the crime. If we continue on the path of following orders in which we don’t agree with society is in for a rude awakening.
I personally feel strongly about this issue for the fact that I have had two possession of alcohol tickets while underage, and feel my punishment did not fit the crime. I am a responsible 4.0 student whom has no criminal record. My punishment for possessing a beer twice has amounted to spending a night in jail, over $1000 dollars in fines, one year court supervision, and 9 months suspended license. Not only is this outrageous but I was informed by McDonough county prosecuting attorney that as of January first if you receive a underage consumption ticket you are no longer eligible to apply for a restricted license. Honestly, do you feel this is fair? How do you expect these individuals to pay for their tickets?
Lastly, I hope my letter made an impression, and I hope you take a moment to consider this issue. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter and hopefully you will do your part in improving our laws as well as making our nation safer as a whole. Please act in ways in which you believe to be reasonable and not in ways you not to be unjust.
The first time I was just being careless and having to much fun which led to getting caught walking around drunk with a drink in my hand, but I was not or did not attend to harm anyone or anything. Second time, first time drinking since my previous ticket; my friend dragged me out of my hole to go drink on spring break and on his girls birthday. I blew a .008 on the breathalizer that night. I am a mature 20 year old that drinks responsible. I always have a DD or I walk to my destination. Do not label me as a criminal or judge me more or less. Like the other person said, the punishment did not fit the crime.
I also live in Macomb, Illinois.
Feels like I've been robbed and scammed, legally.
Please!!! if you have any new information. PLEASE let me know!
thanks
-Jeff





